Canon and Nikon recently released their new pro-level cameras, amid much fanfare and collective drooling from photographers. But a couple of days ago, two other new cameras were released which arguably, might already render both those digital housebricks obsolete.
I've mentioned the Red video camera on occasions before - the first 25 Red-cams rolled off the production line on August 31st, 2007. Their 'Mysterium' imaging chips produce ultra-Hi-Def 4K video, which is capable of producing a 48MB screengrab...a 300 dpi 13 x 7 inch print.
Screengrabs from the first cameras sold, show images produced at the cameras default 320 ISO, up to a whopping 6000 ISO.
This is more than acceptable for newspaper or magazine use (assuming both newspapers and magazines exist long enough), and of course the video footage can be re-purposed for multiple outputs across several media, from the cinema screen (the footage is superior to 35mm cinema film), through to HDTV, IPTV, the Web and down to mobile phones.
In versatility and cost effectiveness terms, the Red-cam arguably leaves 35mm stills cameras high and dry.
The current Red-cam records video to a hard drive and Compact Flash, and the next Red-cam will apparently, be a 'pocket' camera...so its an avowedly disruptive machine, one which appears to leave most conventional Hi-Def video cams for dust and can easily give most SLR's a run for their money...but also fundamentally questions the need for people to 'snatch' moments from thin air anymore.
Wait...it gets even more disruptive - the Red camera costs a heavy chunk o' change, so its implementation will be slow (ish).
But step forward Casio, who released their new stills camera on the same date as the Red.
It shoots a burst of 6 megapixel Jpegs at 60 frames a second, with a pre-burst mode that even records images BEFORE you've even pressed the shutter, and a high speed video mode of 300 frames per second.
The 'decisive moment' was always simply making a virtue out of a technological necessity, but in the process became an article of faith for some photographers.
The question is now that technological 'limitation' has been 'overcome'...what happens now?
The implications for photojournalism are profound...but perhaps no more profound than when a roll of 36 images replaced the single 5x4 sheet film previously used by press photographers.
Was that a retrograde step?
Obviously not.